這款全能檢切工作站特別設計,整合了最先進的工具和標準化,打造了一個適合21世紀的組織檢切系統
eGROSS是首款將檢體識別和檢切記錄的數位化結合起來的產品,將影像記錄標準化、檔案文件化
Equip your pathology laboratory with the safest and most personalized grossing station ever offered. Mopec understands that each pathology professional has their own workspace preferences, and each laboratory holds their own safety, ergonomic and workflow requirements. Because of this, we’ve designed the Mopec Maestro Grossing Station. The MacroPATH digital imaging system can easily be interrogated with the Mopec Grossing Stations and Milestone partners with Mopec to ensure the proper mounts and brackets are provided to do so.
Sharing digital pathology images for enterprise- wide use into a picture archiving and communication system (PACS) is not yet widely adopted. We share our solution and 3-year experience of transmitting such images to an enterprise image server (EIS).
Gross pathology images acquired by prosectors were integrated with clinical cases into the laboratory information system’s image management module, and stored in JPEG2000 format on a networked image server. Automated daily searches for cases with gross images were used to compile an ASCII text file that was forwarded to a separate institutional Enterprise Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Wrapper (EDW) server. Concurrently, an HL7-based image order for these cases was generated, containing the locations of images and patient data, and forwarded to the EDW, which combined data in these locations to generate images with patient data, as required by DICOM standards. The image and data were then “wrapped” according to DICOM standards, transferred to the PACS servers, and made accessible on an institution-wide basis.
In total, 26,966 gross images from 9,733 cases were transmitted over the 3-year period from the laboratory information system to the EIS. The average process time for cases with successful automatic uploads (n=9,688) to the EIS was 98 seconds. Only 45 cases (0.5%) failed requiring manual intervention. Uploaded images were immediately available to institution- wide PACS users. Since inception, user feedback has been positive.
Enterprise- wide PACS- based sharing of pathology images is feasible, provides useful services to clinical staff, and utilizes existing information system and telecommunications infrastructure. PACS-shared pathology images, however, require a “DICOM wrapper” for multisystem compatibility.
In total, 26,966 gross images from 9,733 cases were transmitted from the laboratory information system to the EIS. The average process time for cases with successful automatic uploads (n=9,688) to the EIS was 98 seconds; these times represent the processing time for the patient data and images to run though the EDW system into the EIS, but does not include any processing time in the LIS. Only 45 cases (0.5%) failed, requiring a manual transmission by the information technology support staff; for these cases, the average process time was 1 day, 8 minutes and 10 seconds. More specifically, these 45 cases failed due to a reported “time synchronization” error between the batch process creating the text file and availability of the jpeg images. Moving the batch an hour or so past the end of the working day resolved these errors.
Uploaded images were immediately available to institution-wide PACS users. Since inception, user feedback has been positive (informally evaluated via correspondence and at tumor boards) in several ways. First, digital gross pathology images were readily available to surgeons to help determine follow-up treatment protocols for their patients (e.g., transplant trials based on the amount and type of resected tissue). Second, surgeons no longer had to repeatedly contact pathologists to request gross pathology images of the specimens they removed. Third, these images were available for immediate review in subspecialty-based surgical oncology conferences and for counseling specific patients during clinic appointments. Access to these images has also allowed surgeons to more easily interpret the text-based gross description, including the locations of lesions and the orientation of the specimen, in the pathology reports they receive.
Based on our experience, enterprise-wide PACS-based sharing of pathology digital images is feasible, at least in a large academic hospital setting. As we have demonstrated, this service can be cost effective if existing technology and communications infrastructure can be leveraged. The LIS-PACS partnership described herein, however, involved significant resource commitments, including 15 months of in-house programming time. Similar commercially available methods have since emerged.[13,14] While there is certainly much potential with digital pathology, one of the challenges facing many institutions remains the feasibility of permanently archiving large volumes of pathology images for long periods of time because of their size, compared to imaging from most other disciplines. Advantages of utilizing DICOM compliant digital pathology images include the ease of image distribution to a PACS, downstream multi-system compatibility with other electronic health records, and widespread sharing of images intended to improve client satisfaction and hopefully improve patient care. There is a concerted effort for institutions to begin leveraging their PACS beyond the radiology department for enterprise-wide initiatives such as integration of digital images into the EMR, building decision support tools, supporting quality assurance programs and as a research tool.[15] The LIS-PACS partnership at our institution continues to grow, with future plans for digital gross pathology images acquired at all of our centers to be sent to the PACS, to facilitate enterprise-wide sharing of digital photomicrographs, and perhaps even whole-slide images given the recent push to link these images with DICOM[16] and for PACS to handle whole-slide microscopic images.[17]
1. Integration of digital gross pathology images for enterprise-wide access
Milon Amin, Gaurav Sharma,1 Anil V. Parwani, Ralph Anderson,2 Brian J Kolowitz,2 Anthony Piccoli,2 Rasu B. Shrestha,2 Gonzalo Romero Lauro,2 and Liron Pantanowitz*
13. Ladin M, Geertrui DS, Jacobs J. Agfa HealthCare unveils integrated digital pathology/PACS solution at RSNA. AGFA HealthCare. [Last accessed on 2011 Dec 9]. Available from: http://agfahealthcare.com/usa/en/main/news_events/news/archive/he20111129_lapitie_paris.jsp .
14. Apollo PACS. PathPACS: Apollo Enterprise Patient Media Manager. Apollo Enterprise Patient Media Services. [Last accessed on 2011 Dec 9]. Available from: http://apollopacs.com/products-solutions/pathpacs.php .
15. Stewart BK. Picture archiving and communication systems. In: Hendee WR, editor. Informatics in medical imaging. Vol. 16. United Kingdom: Taylor Andand Francis, MA; 2012. pp. 235–49. [Google Scholar]
16. Tuominen VJ, Isola J. Linking whole-slide microscope images with DICOM by using JPEG2000 interactive protocol. J Digit Imaging. 2010;23:454–62. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17. Punys V, Laurinavicius A, Puniene J. A data model for handling whole slide microscopy images in picture archiving and communications systems. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009;150:856–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
(一個以使用者為導向的病患樣本Marco影像擷取和儲存系統)與eGROSS進行整合
與傳統的拍照和擷取手持式系統相比,它顯著地減少了檢切工作站的樣本處理時間。自動對焦、自動光線調整和通過腳踏板實現的免持操作使用戶可以專注於病患檢體的檢切工作,無需進行手動操作。
WorkSTATION |
eGROSS |
|
---|---|---|
福馬林補充裝置 |
|
|
帶有篩網的福馬林水槽 |
|
|
帶濾網及通風設備的福馬林罐 |
|
|
水源及水槽 |
|
|
生物危害驗證ISO |
|
|
12469附件C |
|
|
具有容易重新定位的滑輪 |
|
|
電動升降高度定位 |
|
|
背向及向下排風設計 |
|
|
通風設備,配備有氣流感應裝置 |
|
|
具有磁條和支架,可供額外的螢幕使用 |
|
|
AIO觸控螢幕主機(安裝MacroPATH軟體) |
|
|
全LED 光源的工作區 |
|
|
CE-IVD 設備 |
|
|